Hi Dubravko,
I learned from Fei that one of his patch(merged, for security) might impact PCIe devices in SOS, could you please help check if your HV include it?
commit 65ed6c3529de8b3f3d890e95a7d816afba7bf379
Author: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@...>
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:51:06 2019 +0800
hv: vpci: trap PCIe ECAM access for SOS
SOS will use PCIe ECAM access PCIe external configuration space. HV should trap this
access for security(Now pre-launched VM doesn't want to support PCI ECAM; post-launched
VM trap PCIe ECAM access in DM).
Besides, update PCIe MMCONFIG region to be owned by hypervisor and expose and pass through
platform hide PCI devices by BIOS to SOS.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@...>
You can have a quick try to revert it firstly if it is included.
Thanks
shuo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 02:19
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Thank you for explaining all the kernel and Ubuntu options. It looks like all the use cases we are interested in are covered.
I've got a replacement board and I'm continuing with ACRN. I've followed your instructions regarding rebuilding the kernel, in which I've enabled the Intel igb network driver we need for the I211
chip.
The new kernel mostly works, however igb driver doesn't (and we really need the network):
clear@clr-sos-guest~/work/acrn-kernel $ cat ../../dmesg_bad.txt | grep igb
[ 3.708554] calling igb_init_module+0x0/0x4d @ 1
[ 3.709199] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.4.0-k
[ 3.710159] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
[ 3.802746] igb 0000:04:00.0 0000:04:00.0 (uninitialized):
PCIe link lost
[ 4.120516] igb 0000:04:00.0: PHY reset is blocked due to SOL/IDER session.
[ 7.504456] igb 0000:04:00.0: Invalid MAC Address
[ 7.505779] igb: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -5
[ 7.507585] initcall igb_init_module+0x0/0x4d returned 0 after 3709354 usecs
The "PCIe link lost" message originates in igb_main.c, approx line 740:
u32 igb_rd32(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 reg)
struct igb_adapter *igb = container_of(hw, struct igb_adapter, hw);
u8 __iomem *hw_addr = READ_ONCE(hw->hw_addr);
if (E1000_REMOVED(hw_addr))
value = readl(&hw_addr[reg]);
/* reads should not return all F's */
if (!(~value) && (!reg || !(~readl(hw_addr)))) {
struct net_device *netdev = igb->netdev;
netdev_err(netdev, "PCIe link lost\n");
}
I think readl() for PCIe devices is basically a single PCIe transfer; in other words it's already the lowest possible level, looking from the software side of things, so it doesn't look like I
could do much debugging here.
In regular Clear Linux, the driver consistently works and there are never any link issues:
clear@clr-sos-guest~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i igb
[ 4.473282] calling igb_init_module+0x0/0x1000 [igb] @ 317
[ 4.473306] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.6.0-k
[ 4.473307] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
[ 4.519304] igb 0000:04:00.0: added PHC on eth0
[ 4.519307] igb 0000:04:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection
[ 4.519310] igb 0000:04:00.0: eth0: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:30:d8:05:55:84
[ 4.519314] igb 0000:04:00.0: eth0: PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
[ 4.519316] igb 0000:04:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 2 rx queue(s), 2 tx queue(s)
[ 4.519418] initcall igb_init_module+0x0/0x1000 [igb] returned 0 after 33714 usecs
[ 5.390826] igb 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: renamed from eth0
[ 8.766862] igb 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: igb: enp4s0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
So is there some setting in ACRN that can affect PCIe communication, that I need to adjust for (external) PCIe devices?
Also with my ACRN-kernel, the mouse works but the cursor is invisible. In regular Clear Linux with 'native' kernel, with the same file system and GUI and system settings, the mouse works and the
cursor is visible.
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
Yes, Service OS kernel can be acrn-kernel only because it has some ACRN specific modules. But UOS kernel doesn’t have such limitation, though normally we build UOS kernel from the same source
with different config (kernel_config_uos).
You can run Ubuntu rootfs + acrn-kernel for SOS:
https://projectacrn.github.io/latest/tutorials/using_ubuntu_as_sos.html
And “real” Ubuntu as UOS:
https://projectacrn.github.io/latest/tutorials/running_ubun_as_user_vm.html
Best Regards,
Zide
I've noticed that for Service OS kernel, you've provided a link to a dedicated repository. I've had a meeting today and was asked to ask the experts on the mailing list to please clarify:
-
Is the dedicated SOS kernel the only one that will work with ACRN?
-
Does UOS also use a special kernel?
-
Related to the previous questions: we would like to use Ubuntu for both SOS and UOS, because many of our customers are familiar with it. Is that possible? If it's not possible to simply use such a distribution right away, is there
a well-defined API or some other kind of interface in ACRN-specific kernels, that we could port to other kernels?
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
I've managed to download the kernel as instructed, enable the required Ethernet driver, and compile the kernel.
Today when I wanted to test it, my board has died, for no particular reason. Hardware team thinks it's not repairable. I'll have to wait a couple of days at least until I get another one.
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like
it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc.
You may compile your own kernel like this:
$ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git
$ cd acrn-kernel
$ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config
$ make menuconfig
$ make
Best Regards,
Zide
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Zide,
Thank you for explaining all the kernel and Ubuntu options. It looks like all the use cases we are interested in are covered.
I've got a replacement board and I'm continuing with ACRN. I've followed your instructions regarding rebuilding the kernel, in which I've enabled the Intel igb network driver we need for the I211 chip.
The new kernel mostly works, however igb driver doesn't (and we really need the network):
clear@clr-sos-guest~/work/acrn-kernel $ cat ../../dmesg_bad.txt | grep igb
[ 3.708554] calling igb_init_module+0x0/0x4d @ 1
[ 3.709199] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.4.0-k
[ 3.710159] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
[ 3.802746] igb 0000:04:00.0 0000:04:00.0 (uninitialized): PCIe link lost
[ 4.120516] igb 0000:04:00.0: PHY reset is blocked due to SOL/IDER session.
[ 7.504456] igb 0000:04:00.0: Invalid MAC Address
[ 7.505779] igb: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -5
[ 7.507585] initcall igb_init_module+0x0/0x4d returned 0 after 3709354 usecs
The "PCIe link lost" message originates in igb_main.c, approx line 740:
u32 igb_rd32(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 reg)
{
struct igb_adapter *igb = container_of(hw, struct igb_adapter, hw);
u8 __iomem *hw_addr = READ_ONCE(hw->hw_addr);
u32 value = 0;
if (E1000_REMOVED(hw_addr))
return ~value;
value = readl(&hw_addr[reg]);
/* reads should not return all F's */
if (!(~value) && (!reg || !(~readl(hw_addr)))) {
struct net_device *netdev = igb->netdev;
hw->hw_addr = NULL;
netdev_err(netdev, "PCIe link lost\n");
}
return value;
}
I think readl() for PCIe devices is basically a single PCIe transfer; in other words it's already the lowest possible level, looking from the software side of things, so it doesn't look like I could do much debugging here.
In regular Clear Linux, the driver consistently works and there are never any link issues:
clear@clr-sos-guest~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i igb
Password:
[ 4.473282] calling igb_init_module+0x0/0x1000 [igb] @ 317
[ 4.473306] igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.6.0-k
[ 4.473307] igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
[ 4.519304] igb 0000:04:00.0: added PHC on eth0
[ 4.519307] igb 0000:04:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection
[ 4.519310] igb 0000:04:00.0: eth0: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) 00:30:d8:05:55:84
[ 4.519314] igb 0000:04:00.0: eth0: PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
[ 4.519316] igb 0000:04:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 2 rx queue(s), 2 tx queue(s)
[ 4.519418] initcall igb_init_module+0x0/0x1000 [igb] returned 0 after 33714 usecs
[ 5.390826] igb 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: renamed from eth0
[ 8.766862] igb 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: igb: enp4s0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
So is there some setting in ACRN that can affect PCIe communication, that I need to adjust for (external) PCIe devices?
Also with my ACRN-kernel, the mouse works but the cursor is invisible. In regular Clear Linux with 'native' kernel, with the same file system and GUI and system settings, the mouse works and the cursor is visible.
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 5:41 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
Yes, Service OS kernel can be acrn-kernel only because it has some ACRN specific modules. But UOS kernel doesn’t have such limitation, though normally we build UOS kernel from the same source with different config
(kernel_config_uos).
You can run Ubuntu rootfs + acrn-kernel for SOS:
https://projectacrn.github.io/latest/tutorials/using_ubuntu_as_sos.html
And “real” Ubuntu as UOS:
https://projectacrn.github.io/latest/tutorials/running_ubun_as_user_vm.html
Best Regards,
Zide
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 7:49 AM
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
I've noticed that for Service OS kernel, you've provided a link to a dedicated repository. I've had a meeting today and was asked to ask the experts on the mailing list to please clarify:
-
Is the dedicated SOS kernel the only one that will work with ACRN?
-
Does UOS also use a special kernel?
-
Related to the previous questions: we would like to use Ubuntu for both SOS and UOS, because many of our customers are familiar with it. Is that possible? If it's not possible to simply use such a distribution right away, is there
a well-defined API or some other kind of interface in ACRN-specific kernels, that we could port to other kernels?
Prima di
stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
I've managed to download the kernel as instructed, enable the required Ethernet driver, and compile the kernel.
Today when I wanted to test it, my board has died, for no particular reason. Hardware team thinks it's not repairable. I'll have to wait a couple of days at least until I get another one.
Prima di
stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like
it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc.
You may compile your own kernel like this:
$ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git
$ cd acrn-kernel
$ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config
$ make menuconfig
$ make
Best Regards,
Zide
|
|
2020 ACRN Project Technical Community Meeting Minutes - WW09'20
ACRN Project TCM - 26th Feb 2020
Location
Agenda
- ACRN project update
N/A
- “How to build a Yocto based SOS on ACRN” by Liu, Fuzhong
Short description: The Yocto Project (YP) is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture.
The project provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices
that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices.
In this session, we will talk about the steps on how to enable Yocto SOS on ACRN
- All: Community open discussion.
Q&A: Toshiki Nishioka: Already boot Yocto SOS on NUC successfully, and found special information (especially config info) were needed in meta-acrn GSG. Could contribute
and update GSG together, thanks.
- Next meeting agenda proposal:
WW |
Topic |
Presenter |
Status |
WW03 |
Expose and pass through platform hidden PCIs devices to SOS |
LI, Fei |
1/15 |
WW08 |
EtherCAT 101 |
MAO, Junjie |
2/18 |
WW09 |
How to build a Yocto based SOS on ACRN |
LIU, Fuzhong |
2/26 |
Marketing/Events
- N/A
Resources
Project URL:
==============================
Best & Regards
Terry
|
|
2020 ACRN Project Technical Community Meeting (2020/1~2020/7): @ Weekly Wednesday 11AM (China-Shanghai), Tuesday 7PM (US-West Coast), Wednesday 3AM (Europe-London)

Wang, Hongbo
Topic (2/26): How to build a Yocto based SOS on ACRN
Presenter: LIU, Fuzhong
Short description: The Yocto Project (YP) is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture.
The project provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices.
In this session, we will talk about the steps on how to enable Yocto SOS on ACRN
Archives:
WW |
Topic |
Presenter |
Status |
WW03 |
Expose and pass through platform hidden PCIs devices to SOS |
LI, Fei |
1/15 |
WW08 |
EtherCAT 101 |
MAO, Junjie |
2/19 |
WW09 |
How to build a Yocto based SOS on ACRN |
LIU, Fuzhong |
2/26 |
Project ACRN: A flexible, light-weight, open
source reference hypervisor for IoT devices
We're still in the early stages of forming this TSC, so instead we invite you to attend a weekly "Technical Community" meeting where we'll meet community members and talk about the ACRN project and plans.
As we explore community interest and involvement opportunities, we'll (re)schedule these meetings at a time convenient to most attendees:
- Meets every Wednesday, Starting Nov 07, 2018: 11AM-12AM (China-Shanghai), 7PM-8PM (US-West Coast), 3AM-4AM (Europe-London)
- Chairperson: Hongbo Wang, hongbo.wang@... (Intel)
- Online conference link: https://zoom.us/j/457171121
- Zoom Meeting ID: 457-171-121
- Online conference phone:
- US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll Free)
- China: +86 010 87833177 or 400 669 9381 (Toll Free)
- Germany: +49 (0) 30 3080 6188 or +49 800 724 3138 (Toll Free)
- Additional international phone numbers
Best regards.
Hongbo
Tel: +86-21-6116 7445
MP: +86-1364 1793 689
|
|

Chen, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 7:49 AM
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
I've noticed that for Service OS kernel, you've provided a link to a dedicated repository. I've had a meeting today and was asked to ask the experts on the mailing list to please clarify:
-
Is the dedicated SOS kernel the only one that will work with ACRN?
-
Does UOS also use a special kernel?
-
Related to the previous questions: we would like to use Ubuntu for both SOS and UOS, because many of our customers are familiar with it. Is that possible? If it's not possible to simply use such a distribution right away, is there
a well-defined API or some other kind of interface in ACRN-specific kernels, that we could port to other kernels?
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
I've managed to download the kernel as instructed, enable the required Ethernet driver, and compile the kernel.
Today when I wanted to test it, my board has died, for no particular reason. Hardware team thinks it's not repairable. I'll have to wait a couple of days at least until I get another one.
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like
it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc.
You may compile your own kernel like this:
$ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git
$ cd acrn-kernel
$ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config
$ make menuconfig
$ make
Best Regards,
Zide
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Zide,
I've noticed that for Service OS kernel, you've provided a link to a dedicated repository. I've had a meeting today and was asked to ask the experts on the mailing list to please clarify:
- Is the dedicated SOS kernel the only one that will work with ACRN?
- Does UOS also use a special kernel?
- Related to the previous questions: we would like to use Ubuntu for both SOS and UOS, because many of our customers are familiar with it. Is that possible? If it's not possible to simply use such a distribution right away, is there a well-defined API or
some other kind of interface in ACRN-specific kernels, that we could port to other kernels?
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. via Lists.Projectacrn.Org
<dubravko.moravski=exorembedded.net@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 4:06 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Zide,
I've managed to download the kernel as instructed, enable the required Ethernet driver, and compile the kernel.
Today when I wanted to test it, my board has died, for no particular reason. Hardware team thinks it's not repairable. I'll have to wait a couple of days at least until I get another one.
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing
this email.
Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 5:27 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like
it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc.
You may compile your own kernel like this:
$ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git
$ cd acrn-kernel
$ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config
$ make menuconfig
$ make
Best Regards,
Zide
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Zide,
I've managed to download the kernel as instructed, enable the required Ethernet driver, and compile the kernel.
Today when I wanted to test it, my board has died, for no particular reason. Hardware team thinks it's not repairable. I'll have to wait a couple of days at least until I get another one.
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 5:27 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like
it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc.
You may compile your own kernel like this:
$ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git
$ cd acrn-kernel
$ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config
$ make menuconfig
$ make
Best Regards,
Zide
|
|

Chen, Zide
Hi Dubravko, I assume x2apic is working for you now since you can mount rootfs. Then you may treat the Ethernet driver issue just like it on the native Linux, for example, /lib/modules/ matches kernel version 'uname -r'? driver module exists? etc. You may compile your own kernel like this: $ git clone https://github.com/projectacrn/acrn-kernel.git$ cd acrn-kernel $ cp kernel_config_uefi_sos .config $ make menuconfig $ make Best Regards, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/19/20 7:20 AM, Shuo A Liu wrote: That’s great. For the Ethernet issue, ‘lspci -k’ to check if the device exists in SOS and how about the driver status? If you are using a customized kernel, make sure the related ethernet driver configured. It may be compiled as module, don’t forget put it into system filesystem(/lib/modules/). Thanks *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *On Behalf Of *Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. *Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2020 22:57 *To:* acrn-users@... *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Shuo, Thank you, you were right, with your fix ACRN loads the Service OS on my board too. Now I have the issue that Ethernet doesn't work (while it does in regular Clear Linux), so I can't download and configure the User OS. I'll try downloading, configuring and recompiling https://github.com/clearlinux-pkgs/linux-iot-lts2018 kernel. Is that the right one and do I need to activate some particular settings so it works well with ACRN? Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38%20512455659> m: +38 5915402413 <tel:+38%205915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:*acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> on behalf of Shuo A Liu via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <shuo.a.liu=intel.com@... <mailto:shuo.a.liu=intel.com@...>> *Sent:* Friday, February 14, 2020 5:48 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, I glanced through the discussion and found it might be a similar issue that I hit today with UP2 board. My problem is that with ACRN enabled the linux kernel cannot bootup APs, without ACRN hypervisor the native kernel works well. I have a fix that posted on acrn-dev maillist several hours ago. Perhaps you can have a quick try and hope it can help. I paste it here. --- On UEFI UP2 board, BIOS startup APs and then they all go into HLT status. Then Guest OS take over and re-init the APs again. The flows from HV perspective is like: wait_event(VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT) -> sleep_thread -> pause_vcpu(ZOMBIE) -> sleep_thread -> reset_vcpu -> launch_vcpu -> wake_vcpu However, the last wake_vcpu will fail because the cpu event VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT had not got signaled. Add signal_event before sleep_thread in pause_vcpu to make sure the vcpu thread is not waiting for event. Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@... <mailto:shuo.a.liu@...>> --- hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c index 6161889..bd2d2d2 100644 --- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c +++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c @@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void pause_vcpu(struct acrn_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_state new_state) vcpu->state = new_state; if (vcpu->prev_state == VCPU_RUNNING) { + /* signal_event will wakeup the vcpu's thread if it's in HLT sleep, else do nothing. */ + signal_event(&vcpu->events[VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT]); sleep_thread(&vcpu->thread_obj); } if (pcpu_id != get_pcpu_id()) { -- 2.8.3 Thanks shuo *From:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> *On Behalf Of *Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. *Sent:* Friday, February 14, 2020 23:41 *To:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Zide, 1) X2APIC I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux: clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic [ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping. [ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode [ 0.167426] x2apic enabled [ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic. clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table. Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS? 2) Linux logs I'm working on this and will report later. By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever option was selected, instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more careful. Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help. 3) Naked HV ... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I switch back to SOS, nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN console. Here are some printouts: [13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4 [13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset [13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000 [13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4 [13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset [13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000 [13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4 [13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset [13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000 [13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]... [13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1 [13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]... [13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1 [13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]... [13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1 [13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 /* ctrl+space */ ---Entering ACRN SHELL--- ACRN:\> ACRN:\>version HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide API version 1.0 ACRN:\>vm_list VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE ================================ ===== ================================ ======== dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started ACRN:\>vcpu_list VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE ===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ========== 0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING 0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED 0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED 0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED ACRN:\>vioapic Error: Invalid parameters. ACRN:\>vioapic 0 PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK 0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\>vm_console 0 ----- Entering VM 0 Shell ----- /* no reaction to any regular keys */ /* ctrl+space */ ---Entering ACRN SHELL--- ACRN:\> Thank you again, I would never get this far without help. Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38%20512455659> m: +38 5915402413 <tel:+38%205915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:*acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...><acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@... <mailto:zide.chen=intel.com@...>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 9:04 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...><acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, 1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support. We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg? 2) Need Linux logs to help debugging. Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console. Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before. It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue. diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644 --- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c +++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8) vu->lsr |= LSR_OE; } else { fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8); + printf("%c", value_u8); } vu->thre_int_pending = true; break; 3) "naked" HV is working? In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV console commands. diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644 --- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c +++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c @@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id) uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id; struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config; + return; + for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) { vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id); if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) { Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote: > Hi Dubravko, > > With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"? > > The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS? > > Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now. > > BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any > Linux logs. > > From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence > (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT > and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage? > > Best Regards, > Zide > > On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote: >> Hi Zide, >> >> I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the >> mentioned setting or similar or related to it. >> >> We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from >> https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added >> support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well. >> >> Best regards, >> Dubravko >> >> >> *Dubravko Moravski* >> /SW engineering/ >> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* >> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659 <tel:+38%20512455659>> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38%205915402413>> >> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 >> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> >> >> >> >> >> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> *From:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> on behalf of Chen, Zide via >> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@... <mailto:zide.chen=intel.com@...>> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM >> *To:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> >> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work >> Hi Dubravko, >> >> In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any >> difference? >> >> Best Regards, >> Zide >> >> On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf. >>> >>> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and >>> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall >>> behavior is the same. >>> >>> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to >>> reference Leaf Hill CRB. >>> >>> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and >>> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything). >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Dubravko >>> >>> >>> *Dubravko Moravski* >>> /SW engineering/ >>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* >>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659 <tel:+38%20512455659>> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38%205915402413>> >>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 >>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. >>> >>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> *From:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> on behalf of Chen, Zide via >>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@... <mailto:zide.chen=intel.com@...>> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM >>> *To:* acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...> <acrn-users@... <mailto:acrn-users@...>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work >>> Hi Dubravko, >>> >>> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be >>> ignored for now. >>> >>> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and >>> need to debug it. >>> >>> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached >>> bzImage? >>> >>> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in >>> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console >>> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you >>> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor. >>> >>> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Zide >>> >>> zide.chen@... <mailto:zide.chen@...> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>
|
|
That’s great.
For the Ethernet issue, ‘lspci -k’ to check if the device exists in SOS and how about the driver status?
If you are using a customized kernel, make sure the related ethernet driver configured. It may be compiled as module, don’t forget put it into system filesystem(/lib/modules/).
Thanks
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 22:57
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Thank you, you were right, with your fix ACRN loads the Service OS on my board too.
Now I have the issue that Ethernet doesn't work (while it does in regular Clear Linux), so I can't download and configure the User OS. I'll try downloading, configuring and recompiling https://github.com/clearlinux-pkgs/linux-iot-lts2018
kernel. Is that the right one and do I need to activate some particular settings so it works well with ACRN?
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
I glanced through the discussion and found it might be a similar issue that I hit today with UP2 board.
My problem is that with ACRN enabled the linux kernel cannot bootup APs, without ACRN hypervisor the native kernel works well.
I have a fix that posted on acrn-dev maillist several hours ago. Perhaps you can have a quick try and hope it can help.
I paste it here.
---
On UEFI UP2 board, BIOS startup APs and then they all go into HLT status.
Then Guest OS take over and re-init the APs again. The flows from HV perspective is like:
wait_event(VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT) -> sleep_thread
-> pause_vcpu(ZOMBIE) -> sleep_thread
-> reset_vcpu
-> launch_vcpu -> wake_vcpu
However, the last wake_vcpu will fail because the cpu event VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT had not got signaled.
Add signal_event before sleep_thread in pause_vcpu to make sure the vcpu thread is not waiting for event.
Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...>
---
hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
index 6161889..bd2d2d2 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
@@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void pause_vcpu(struct acrn_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_state new_state)
vcpu->state = new_state;
if (vcpu->prev_state == VCPU_RUNNING) {
+ /* signal_event will wakeup the vcpu's thread if it's in HLT sleep, else do nothing. */
+ signal_event(&vcpu->events[VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT]);
sleep_thread(&vcpu->thread_obj);
}
if (pcpu_id != get_pcpu_id()) {
--
2.8.3
Thanks
shuo
I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux:
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic
[ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
[ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
[ 0.167426] x2apic enabled
[ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic.
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $
Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table.
Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS?
I'm working on this and will report later.
By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever
option was selected, instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more careful.
Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help.
... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I
switch back to SOS, nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN console. Here are some printouts:
[13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4
[13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset
[13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000
[13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4
[13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset
[13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000
[13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4
[13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset
[13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000
[13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]...
[13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1
[13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]...
[13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1
[13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]...
[13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1
[13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>version
HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide
VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE
================================ ===== ================================ ========
dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started
VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE
===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ==========
0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING
0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
Error: Invalid parameters.
PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK
0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
----- Entering VM 0 Shell -----
/* no reaction to any regular keys */
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
Thank you again, I would never get this far without help.
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux
Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support.
We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling
X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg?
2) Need Linux logs to help debugging.
Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console.
Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before.
It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue.
diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644
--- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
+++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8)
vu->lsr |= LSR_OE;
} else {
fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8);
+ printf("%c", value_u8);
}
vu->thre_int_pending = true;
break;
3) "naked" HV is working?
In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is
supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV
console commands.
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
@@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id)
uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id;
struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config;
+ return;
+
for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) {
vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id);
if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) {
Best Regards,
Zide
On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Hi Dubravko,
>
> With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
>
> The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
>
> Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
>
> BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any
> Linux logs.
>
> From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence
> (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT
> and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
>
> Best Regards,
> Zide
>
> On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>> Hi Zide,
>>
>> I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the
>> mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
>>
>> We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from
>>
https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added
>> support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dubravko
>>
>>
>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>> /SW engineering/
>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM
>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>> Hi Dubravko,
>>
>> In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any
>> difference?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Zide
>>
>> On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
>>>
>>> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and
>>> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall
>>> behavior is the same.
>>>
>>> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to
>>> reference Leaf Hill CRB.
>>>
>>> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and
>>> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dubravko
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>>> /SW engineering/
>>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>
>>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM
>>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>>> Hi Dubravko,
>>>
>>> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be
>>> ignored for now.
>>>
>>> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and
>>> need to debug it.
>>>
>>> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached
>>> bzImage?
>>>
>>> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in
>>> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console
>>> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you
>>> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
>>>
>>> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Zide
>>>
>>> zide.chen@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Shuo,
Thank you, you were right, with your fix ACRN loads the Service OS on my board too.
Now I have the issue that Ethernet doesn't work (while it does in regular Clear Linux), so I can't download and configure the User OS. I'll try downloading, configuring and recompiling https://github.com/clearlinux-pkgs/linux-iot-lts2018
kernel. Is that the right one and do I need to activate some particular settings so it works well with ACRN?
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Shuo A Liu via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <shuo.a.liu=intel.com@...>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 5:48 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
I glanced through the discussion and found it might be a similar issue that I hit today with UP2 board.
My problem is that with ACRN enabled the linux kernel cannot bootup APs, without ACRN hypervisor the native kernel works well.
I have a fix that posted on acrn-dev maillist several hours ago. Perhaps you can have a quick try and hope it can help.
I paste it here.
---
On UEFI UP2 board, BIOS startup APs and then they all go into HLT status.
Then Guest OS take over and re-init the APs again. The flows from HV perspective is like:
wait_event(VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT) -> sleep_thread
-> pause_vcpu(ZOMBIE) -> sleep_thread
-> reset_vcpu
-> launch_vcpu -> wake_vcpu
However, the last wake_vcpu will fail because the cpu event VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT had not got signaled.
Add signal_event before sleep_thread in pause_vcpu to make sure the vcpu thread is not waiting for event.
Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...>
---
hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
index 6161889..bd2d2d2 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
@@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void pause_vcpu(struct acrn_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_state new_state)
vcpu->state = new_state;
if (vcpu->prev_state == VCPU_RUNNING) {
+ /* signal_event will wakeup the vcpu's thread if it's in HLT sleep, else do nothing. */
+ signal_event(&vcpu->events[VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT]);
sleep_thread(&vcpu->thread_obj);
}
if (pcpu_id != get_pcpu_id()) {
--
2.8.3
Thanks
shuo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 23:41
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux:
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic
[ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
[ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
[ 0.167426] x2apic enabled
[ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic.
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $
Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table.
Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS?
I'm working on this and will report later.
By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever option was selected,
instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more careful.
Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help.
... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I switch back to SOS,
nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN console. Here are some printouts:
[13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4
[13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset
[13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000
[13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4
[13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset
[13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000
[13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4
[13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset
[13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000
[13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]...
[13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1
[13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]...
[13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1
[13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]...
[13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1
[13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>version
HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide
VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE
================================ ===== ================================ ========
dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started
VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE
===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ==========
0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING
0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
Error: Invalid parameters.
PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK
0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
----- Entering VM 0 Shell -----
/* no reaction to any regular keys */
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
Thank you again, I would never get this far without help.
Prima
di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux
Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support.
We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling
X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg?
2) Need Linux logs to help debugging.
Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console.
Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before.
It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue.
diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644
--- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
+++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8)
vu->lsr |= LSR_OE;
} else {
fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8);
+ printf("%c", value_u8);
}
vu->thre_int_pending = true;
break;
3) "naked" HV is working?
In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is
supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV
console commands.
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
@@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id)
uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id;
struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config;
+ return;
+
for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) {
vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id);
if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) {
Best Regards,
Zide
On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Hi Dubravko,
>
> With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
>
> The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
>
> Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
>
> BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any
> Linux logs.
>
> From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence
> (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT
> and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
>
> Best Regards,
> Zide
>
> On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>> Hi Zide,
>>
>> I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the
>> mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
>>
>> We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from
>>
https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added
>> support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dubravko
>>
>>
>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>> /SW engineering/
>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM
>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>> Hi Dubravko,
>>
>> In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any
>> difference?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Zide
>>
>> On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
>>>
>>> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and
>>> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall
>>> behavior is the same.
>>>
>>> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to
>>> reference Leaf Hill CRB.
>>>
>>> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and
>>> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dubravko
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>>> /SW engineering/
>>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>
>>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM
>>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>>> Hi Dubravko,
>>>
>>> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be
>>> ignored for now.
>>>
>>> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and
>>> need to debug it.
>>>
>>> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached
>>> bzImage?
>>>
>>> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in
>>> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console
>>> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you
>>> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
>>>
>>> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Zide
>>>
>>> zide.chen@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|
2020 ACRN Project Technical Community Meeting Minutes - WW08'20

Wang, Hongbo
ACRN Project TCM - 18th Feb 2020
Location
Agenda
- ACRN project update
N/A
- “EtherCAT 101” by MAO, Junjie
Short description: EtherCAT (Ethernet for Control Automation Technology) is a popular fieldbus technology for industrial control and can be used in safety-critical scenarios
together with FSoE (Fail Safe over EtherCAT). It is thus important to understand the technology and analyze its impact to the design of ACRN which targets to be a real-time and safe hypervisor suitable for IoT areas including industry. In this session, we will
brief the fundamental concepts and principles of EtherCAT and FSoE to establish the prerequisite for further analysis on enabling VMs with EtherCAT workloads atop ACRN.
- All: Community open discussion.
- Next meeting agenda proposal:
WW |
Topic |
Presenter |
Status |
WW03 |
Expose and pass through platform hidden PCIs devices to SOS |
LI, Fei |
1/15 |
WW08 |
EtherCAT 101 |
MAO, Junjie |
2/18 |
Marketing/Events
- N/A
Resources
- Project URL:
- Portal: https://projectacrn.org
- Source code: https://github.com/projectacrn
- email: info@...g
- Technical Mailing list: acrn-dev@...g
========================
Best regards.
Hongbo
Tel: +86-21-6116 7445
MP: +86-1364 1793 689
|
|
2020 ACRN Project Technical Community Meeting (2020/1~2020/7): @ Weekly Wednesday 11AM (China-Shanghai), Tuesday 7PM (US-West Coast), Wednesday 3AM (Europe-London)

Wang, Hongbo
Topic (2/19):
EtherCAT 101
Presenter: MAO, Junjie
Short description: EtherCAT (Ethernet for Control Automation Technology) is a popular fieldbus technology for industrial control and can be used in safety-critical scenarios together with FSoE (Fail Safe over EtherCAT). It is thus important to understand
the technology and analyze its impact to the design of ACRN which targets to be a real-time and safe hypervisor suitable for IoT areas including industry. In this session, we will brief the fundamental concepts and principles of EtherCAT and FSoE to establish
the prerequisite for further analysis on enabling VMs with EtherCAT workloads atop ACRN.
Archives:
WW |
Topic |
Presenter |
Status |
WW03 |
Expose and pass through platform hidden PCIs devices to SOS |
LI, Fei |
1/15 |
WW08 |
EtherCAT 101 |
MAO, Junjie |
2/18 |
Project ACRN: A flexible, light-weight, open
source reference hypervisor for IoT devices
We're still in the early stages of forming this TSC, so instead we invite you to attend a weekly "Technical Community" meeting where we'll meet community members and talk about the ACRN project and plans.
As we explore community interest and involvement opportunities, we'll (re)schedule these meetings at a time convenient to most attendees:
- Meets every Wednesday, Starting Nov 07, 2018: 11AM-12AM (China-Shanghai), 7PM-8PM (US-West Coast), 3AM-4AM (Europe-London)
- Chairperson: Hongbo Wang, hongbo.wang@... (Intel)
- Online conference link: https://zoom.us/j/457171121
- Zoom Meeting ID: 457-171-121
- Online conference phone:
- US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 877 369 0926 (Toll Free) or +1 855 880 1246 (Toll Free)
- China: +86 010 87833177 or 400 669 9381 (Toll Free)
- Germany: +49 (0) 30 3080 6188 or +49 800 724 3138 (Toll Free)
- Additional international phone numbers
Best regards.
Hongbo
Tel: +86-21-6116 7445
MP: +86-1364 1793 689
|
|

Chen, Zide
Hi Dubravko,
You are very welcome! Additional to Shuo's suggestion, here are some advices:
1) X2APIC. I added this log but didn't see it from your log. That's why I claimed that the guest didn't switch to x2apic. pr_err("vm%d vcpu%d switched to X2APIC new %x", vlapic->vm->vm_id, vlapic->vcpu->vcpu_id, new);
BTW, Hypervisor passthru the CPUID X2APIC capability (CPUID.01.ECX[21]) to the guest and it's up to the guest to enable X2APIC.
2) Linux logs
Hypervisor provides a virtual UART port to Linux and expects Linux to detect it. You may double check the BASE/IRQ macro in your hypervisor code, and try to explicitly tell Linux with this info thru the bootargs?
scenarios/sdc/vm_configurations.c struct acrn_vm_config vm_configs[CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM] = { { .load_order = SOS_VM, .name = "ACRN SOS VM", .vuart[0] = { .type = VUART_LEGACY_PIO, .addr.port_base = SOS_COM1_BASE, // 0x3F8 .irq = SOS_COM1_IRQ, // 4 }, } }
3) VCPU BLOCKED state. This may be OK. HV could block the VCPU when it'handling guest's IO requests. Or it's never been woken up by SIPI. As I mentioned previously, I didn't see such SIPI sequences on other boards before and can't say it actually works or not. I'd suggest to use "MAXCPUS=1" to force the guest boot with one single CPU only.
4) HV console So far so good. You may try other commands which may further indicate the guest's status.
ACRN:\>int
IRQ VECTOR CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0 0x20 28 0 0 0 1 0x21 0 0 0 0 2 0x22 0 0 0 0 3 0x23 0 0 0 0 4 0x24 0 0 0 0 5 0x25 0 0 0 0 6 0x26 0 0 0 0 7 0x27 0 0 0 0 8 0x28 0 0 0 1 9 0x29 0 5718 0 0 10 0x2A 0 0 0 0 11 0x2B 0 0 0 0 12 0x2C 0 0 0 0 13 0x2D 0 0 0 0 14 0x2E 0 0 0 0 15 0x2F 0 0 0 0 16 0x34 0 0 0 0 17 0x35 0 0 0 0 18 0x31 0 0 0 0 120 0x30 0 0 0 0 121 0x32 0 0 539127 0 122 0x33 0 0 0 46 123 0x36 0 0 21117 0 124 0x37 0 1061 0 0 125 0x38 0 0 34354 0 252 0xF4 0 0 0 0 253 0xF2 0 0 0 0 254 0xF0 99624 55478 75017 72695 255 0xEF 4761444 2072151 2408597 2532948
ACRN:\>pt
VM TYPE IRQ VEC DEST TM PIN VPIN BDF VBDF 0 IOAPIC 0 0x20 0x0 edge 2 2 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 9 0x29 0x0 level 9 9 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 18 0x31 0x0 level 18 18 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 15 0x2F 0x0 edge 15 15 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 14 0x2E 0x0 level 14 14 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 13 0x2D 0x0 edge 13 13 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 12 0x2C 0x0 edge 12 12 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 11 0x2B 0x0 edge 11 11 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 10 0x2A 0x0 edge 10 10 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 8 0x28 0x0 edge 8 8 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 7 0x27 0x0 edge 7 7 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 6 0x26 0x0 edge 6 6 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 5 0x25 0x0 edge 5 5 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 1 0x21 0x0 edge 1 1 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 MSI 121 0x32 0x2 edge 255 255 0:2.0 0:2.0 0 MSI 122 0x33 0x0 edge 255 255 0:16.0 0:16.0 0 IOAPIC 16 0x34 0x0 level 16 16 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 IOAPIC 17 0x35 0x0 level 17 17 0:0.0 0:0.0 0 MSI 123 0x36 0x0 edge 255 255 0:17.0 0:17.0 0 MSI 124 0x37 0x0 edge 255 255 0:14.0 0:14.0 0 MSI 125 0x38 0x0 edge 255 255 0:1f.6 0:1f.6
Best Regards, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/14/20 7:41 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote: Hi Zide, 1) X2APIC I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux: clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic [ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping. [ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode [ 0.167426] x2apic enabled [ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic. clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table. Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS? 2) Linux logs I'm working on this and will report later. By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever option was selected, instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more careful. Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help. 3) Naked HV ... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I switch back to SOS, nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN console. Here are some printouts: [13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4 [13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset [13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000 [13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4 [13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset [13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000 [13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4 [13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset [13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000 [13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]... [13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1 [13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]... [13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1 [13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1 [13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]... [13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1 [13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 [13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2 /* ctrl+space */ ---Entering ACRN SHELL--- ACRN:\> ACRN:\>version HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide API version 1.0 ACRN:\>vm_list VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE ================================ ===== ================================ ======== dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started ACRN:\>vcpu_list VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE ===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ========== 0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING 0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED 0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED 0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED ACRN:\>vioapic Error: Invalid parameters. ACRN:\>vioapic 0 PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK 0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1 ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\> ACRN:\>vm_console 0 ----- Entering VM 0 Shell ----- /* no reaction to any regular keys */ /* ctrl+space */ ---Entering ACRN SHELL--- ACRN:\> Thank you again, I would never get this far without help. Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 9:04 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, 1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support. We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg? 2) Need Linux logs to help debugging. Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console. Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before. It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue. diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644 --- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c +++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8) vu->lsr |= LSR_OE; } else { fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8); + printf("%c", value_u8); } vu->thre_int_pending = true; break; 3) "naked" HV is working? In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV console commands. diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644 --- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c +++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c @@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id) uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id; struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config; + return; + for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) { vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id); if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) { Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
Hi Dubravko, With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"? The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS? Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now. BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any Linux logs. From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage? Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hi Zide,
I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference?
Best Regards, Zide
On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hello,
Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall behavior is the same.
New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to reference Leaf Hill CRB.
After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
"Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be ignored for now.
For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and need to debug it.
I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached bzImage?
Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
Best Regards, Zide
zide.chen@...
|
|
Hi Dubravko,
I glanced through the discussion and found it might be a similar issue that I hit today with UP2 board.
My problem is that with ACRN enabled the linux kernel cannot bootup APs, without ACRN hypervisor the native kernel works well.
I have a fix that posted on acrn-dev maillist several hours ago. Perhaps you can have a quick try and hope it can help.
I paste it here.
---
On UEFI UP2 board, BIOS startup APs and then they all go into HLT status.
Then Guest OS take over and re-init the APs again. The flows from HV perspective is like:
wait_event(VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT) -> sleep_thread
-> pause_vcpu(ZOMBIE) -> sleep_thread
-> reset_vcpu
-> launch_vcpu -> wake_vcpu
However, the last wake_vcpu will fail because the cpu event VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT had not got signaled.
Add signal_event before sleep_thread in pause_vcpu to make sure the vcpu thread is not waiting for event.
Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...>
---
hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
index 6161889..bd2d2d2 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vcpu.c
@@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void pause_vcpu(struct acrn_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_state new_state)
vcpu->state = new_state;
if (vcpu->prev_state == VCPU_RUNNING) {
+ /* signal_event will wakeup the vcpu's thread if it's in HLT sleep, else do nothing. */
+ signal_event(&vcpu->events[VCPU_EVENT_VIRTUAL_INTERRUPT]);
sleep_thread(&vcpu->thread_obj);
}
if (pcpu_id != get_pcpu_id()) {
--
2.8.3
Thanks
shuo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
On Behalf Of Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l.
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 23:41
To: acrn-users@...
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux:
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic
[ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
[ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
[ 0.167426] x2apic enabled
[ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic.
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $
Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table.
Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS?
I'm working on this and will report later.
By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever
option was selected, instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more careful.
Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help.
... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I
switch back to SOS, nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN console. Here are some printouts:
[13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4
[13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset
[13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000
[13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4
[13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset
[13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000
[13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4
[13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset
[13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000
[13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]...
[13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1
[13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]...
[13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1
[13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]...
[13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1
[13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>version
HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide
VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE
================================ ===== ================================ ========
dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started
VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE
===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ==========
0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING
0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
Error: Invalid parameters.
PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK
0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
----- Entering VM 0 Shell -----
/* no reaction to any regular keys */
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
Thank you again, I would never get this far without help.
Prima
di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy
Hi Dubravko,
1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux
Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support.
We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling
X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg?
2) Need Linux logs to help debugging.
Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console.
Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before.
It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue.
diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644
--- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
+++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8)
vu->lsr |= LSR_OE;
} else {
fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8);
+ printf("%c", value_u8);
}
vu->thre_int_pending = true;
break;
3) "naked" HV is working?
In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is
supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV
console commands.
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
@@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id)
uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id;
struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config;
+ return;
+
for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) {
vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id);
if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) {
Best Regards,
Zide
On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Hi Dubravko,
>
> With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
>
> The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
>
> Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
>
> BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any
> Linux logs.
>
> From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence
> (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT
> and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
>
> Best Regards,
> Zide
>
> On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>> Hi Zide,
>>
>> I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the
>> mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
>>
>> We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from
>>
https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added
>> support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dubravko
>>
>>
>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>> /SW engineering/
>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM
>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>> Hi Dubravko,
>>
>> In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any
>> difference?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Zide
>>
>> On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
>>>
>>> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and
>>> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall
>>> behavior is the same.
>>>
>>> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to
>>> reference Leaf Hill CRB.
>>>
>>> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and
>>> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dubravko
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>>> /SW engineering/
>>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>>> w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>
>>> Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM
>>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>>> Hi Dubravko,
>>>
>>> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be
>>> ignored for now.
>>>
>>> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and
>>> need to debug it.
>>>
>>> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached
>>> bzImage?
>>>
>>> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in
>>> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console
>>> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you
>>> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
>>>
>>> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Zide
>>>
>>> zide.chen@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Zide,
1) X2APIC
I see that it's not mentioned anywhere in ACRN log (and I suppose it should be), but it seems to be enabled somehow in non-hypervised Linux:
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $ sudo dmesg | grep -i x2apic
[ 0.165205] DMAR-IR: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
[ 0.167422] DMAR-IR: Enabled IRQ remapping in x2apic mode
[ 0.167426] x2apic enabled
[ 0.167448] Switched APIC routing to cluster x2apic.
clear@clr-bcdcb0fadf6546d7b0984fe80030eee8~ $
Our BIOS does not have a GUI setting to manually enable it, and we couldn't find where to explicitly enable it in source code. It's mentioned at many places; though not in DMAR table.
Can we conclude from the log above that it's ok, or we still need to find a way to enable it in ACRN or BIOS?
2) Linux logs
I'm working on this and will report later.
By the way, I think my last logs might be inconsistent with earlier ones (with endless SIPI messages) because earlier I might have in a hurry just pressed enter in the boot menu to choose whichever option was selected, instead of selecting ACRN. Now I'm more
careful.
Removing 'quiet' parameter didn't help.
3) Naked HV
... is working. With your previous acrn.efi and bzImage from around Wednesday noon Central European Time, after serial boot log stops, I can indeed switch to ACRN console with ctrl+space. If I switch back to SOS, nothing happens. I can only return back to ACRN
console. Here are some printouts:
[13133696us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=322]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13146659us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=323]:vcpu1 paused, new state: 4
[13154097us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=324]:vcpu1 reset
[13160078us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=325]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu1 initial lapic_id: 2000000
[13170960us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=326]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13183985us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=327]:vcpu2 paused, new state: 4
[13191429us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=328]:vcpu2 reset
[13197408us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=329]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu2 initial lapic_id: 4000000
[13208295us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=330]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 500 icr_low c4500 sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13221324us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=331]:vcpu3 paused, new state: 4
[13228769us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=332]:vcpu3 reset
[13234748us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=333]:vlapic: vlapic_reset 1693 vm0 vcpu3 initial lapic_id: 6000000
[13255651us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=334]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13268597us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=335]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU1 for VM[0]...
[13277605us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=336]:vcpu1 scheduled on pcpu1 vcpu->state 1
[13286228us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=337]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13299256us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=338]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU2 for VM[0]...
[13308274us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=339]:vcpu2 scheduled on pcpu2 vcpu->state 1
[13316902us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=340]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 1 vcpu state 1
[13329919us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=341]:vlapic: Start Secondary VCPU3 for VM[0]...
[13338926us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=342]:vcpu3 scheduled on pcpu3 vcpu->state 1
[13347768us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=343]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu1, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13360707us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=344]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu2, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
[13373751us][cpu=0][vm0:vcpu0][sev=3][seq=345]:vlapic: pcpu0 Sending SIPI to vcpu3, mode 600 icr_low c469f sipi cnt 0 vcpu state 2
/* ctrl+space */
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>version
HV version 1.6-unstable-2020-02-11 15:28:54-4990d8574159 DBG (daily tag: acrn-2020w03.4-140000p) build by zide
API version 1.0
ACRN:\>vm_list
VM_UUID VM_ID VM_NAME VM_STATE
================================ ===== ================================ ========
dbbbd4347a574216a12c2201f1ab0240 0 ACRN SOS VM Started
ACRN:\>vcpu_list
VM ID PCPU ID VCPU ID VCPU ROLE VCPU STATE THREAD STATE
===== ======= ======= ========= ========== ==========
0 0 0 PRIMARY Running RUNNING
0 1 1 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 2 2 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
0 3 3 SECONDARY Running BLOCKED
ACRN:\>vioapic
Error: Invalid parameters.
ACRN:\>vioapic 0
PIN VEC DM DEST TM DELM IRR MASK
0 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
1 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
2 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
3 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
4 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
5 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
6 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
7 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
8 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
9 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
10 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
11 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
12 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
13 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
14 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
15 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
16 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
17 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
18 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
19 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
20 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
21 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
22 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
23 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
24 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
25 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
26 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
27 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
28 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
29 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
30 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
31 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
32 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
33 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
34 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
35 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
36 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
37 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
38 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
39 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
40 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
41 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
42 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
43 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
44 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
45 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
46 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
47 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
48 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
49 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
50 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
51 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
52 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
53 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
54 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
55 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
56 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
57 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
58 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
59 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
60 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
61 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
62 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
63 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
64 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
65 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
66 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
67 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
68 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
69 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
70 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
71 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
72 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
73 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
74 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
75 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
76 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
77 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
78 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
79 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
80 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
81 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
82 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
83 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
84 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
85 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
86 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
87 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
88 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
89 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
90 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
91 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
92 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
93 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
94 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
95 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
96 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
97 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
98 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
99 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
100 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
101 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
102 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
103 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
104 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
105 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
106 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
107 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
108 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
109 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
110 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
111 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
112 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
113 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
114 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
115 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
116 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
117 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
118 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
119 0x0 phys 0x0 edge 0 0 1
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>
ACRN:\>vm_console 0
----- Entering VM 0 Shell -----
/* no reaction to any regular keys */
/* ctrl+space */
---Entering ACRN SHELL---
ACRN:\>
Thank you again, I would never get this far without help.
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 9:04 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux
Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support.
We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling
X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg?
2) Need Linux logs to help debugging.
Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console.
Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before.
It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue.
diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644
--- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
+++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8)
vu->lsr |= LSR_OE;
} else {
fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8);
+ printf("%c", value_u8);
}
vu->thre_int_pending = true;
break;
3) "naked" HV is working?
In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is
supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV
console commands.
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644
--- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
+++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c
@@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id)
uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id;
struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config;
+ return;
+
for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) {
vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id);
if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) {
Best Regards,
Zide
On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Hi Dubravko,
>
> With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
>
> The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
>
> Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
>
> BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any
> Linux logs.
>
> From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence
> (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT
> and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
>
> Best Regards,
> Zide
>
> On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>> Hi Zide,
>>
>> I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the
>> mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
>>
>> We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from
>>
https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added
>> support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dubravko
>>
>>
>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>> /SW engineering/
>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>> w: exorint.com < https://exorint.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> Privacy < https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM
>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>> Hi Dubravko,
>>
>> In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any
>> difference?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Zide
>>
>> On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
>>>
>>> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and
>>> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall
>>> behavior is the same.
>>>
>>> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to
>>> reference Leaf Hill CRB.
>>>
>>> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and
>>> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dubravko
>>>
>>>
>>> *Dubravko Moravski*
>>> /SW engineering/
>>> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
>>> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
>>> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
>>> w: exorint.com < https://exorint.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>
>>> Privacy < https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
>>> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM
>>> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
>>> Hi Dubravko,
>>>
>>> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be
>>> ignored for now.
>>>
>>> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and
>>> need to debug it.
>>>
>>> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached
>>> bzImage?
>>>
>>> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in
>>> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console
>>> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you
>>> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
>>>
>>> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Zide
>>>
>>> zide.chen@...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|

Chen, Zide
One more thing you may try: add maxcpus=1 to acrn.conf options, so we can skip the SIPI issue and see how it goes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/12/20 12:04 PM, Chen, Zide wrote: Hi Dubravko, 1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support. We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg? 2) Need Linux logs to help debugging. Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console. Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before. It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue. diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644 --- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c +++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8) vu->lsr |= LSR_OE; } else { fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8); + printf("%c", value_u8); } vu->thre_int_pending = true; break; 3) "naked" HV is working? In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV console commands. diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644 --- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c +++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c @@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id) uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id; struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config; + return; + for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) { vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id); if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) { Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
Hi Dubravko,
With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any Linux logs.
From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
Best Regards, Zide
On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hi Zide,
I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference?
Best Regards, Zide
On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hello,
Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall behavior is the same.
New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to reference Leaf Hill CRB.
After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
"Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be ignored for now.
For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and need to debug it.
I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached bzImage?
Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
Best Regards, Zide
zide.chen@...
|
|

Chen, Zide
Hi Dubravko,
1) Enable X2APIC from guest Linux
Actually ACRN checks X2APIC capability and it goes panic w/o it. So the host CPUID must have X2APIC support.
We met one case where the BIOS DMAR setting has some thing like "do not use x2apic", which prevents Linux from enabling X2APIC. Or you may check why the guest doesn't switch to X2APIC from native Linux dmesg?
2) Need Linux logs to help debugging.
Attached is the ACRN built with the following hack, which directs guest serial prints directly to HV console. Seems Linux goes to the path of numachip_wakeup_secondary() to send SIPIs to secondary CPUs, which we didn't see before. It's good to see Linux early pintk t help address the issue.
diff --git a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c index 8771a7d8a15f..be5f0da943b8 100644 --- a/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c +++ b/hypervisor/dm/vuart.c @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static void write_reg(struct acrn_vuart *vu, uint16_t reg, uint8_t value_u8) vu->lsr |= LSR_OE; } else { fifo_putchar(&vu->txfifo, (char)value_u8); + printf("%c", value_u8); } vu->thre_int_pending = true; break;
3) "naked" HV is working?
In the meantime, if you want, you can hack ACRN with the following and it won't launch any VMs and the HV console is supposed to be working. It's just a way to check that ACRN is "generally" working on the HW and you may play with some HV console commands.
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c index 0471324be065..53ccb6b9acae 100644 --- a/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c +++ b/hypervisor/arch/x86/guest/vm.c @@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ void launch_vms(uint16_t pcpu_id) uint16_t vm_id, bsp_id; struct acrn_vm_config *vm_config;
+ return; + for (vm_id = 0U; vm_id < CONFIG_MAX_VM_NUM; vm_id++) { vm_config = get_vm_config(vm_id); if ((vm_config->load_order == SOS_VM) || (vm_config->load_order == PRE_LAUNCHED_VM)) {
Best Regards, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/12/20 11:05 AM, Zide Chen wrote: Hi Dubravko, With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"? The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS? Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now. BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any Linux logs. From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage? Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hi Zide,
I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well.
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference?
Best Regards, Zide
On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hello,
Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall behavior is the same.
New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to reference Leaf Hill CRB.
After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
Best regards, Dubravko
*Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/>
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko,
"Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be ignored for now.
For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and need to debug it.
I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached bzImage?
Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
Best Regards, Zide
zide.chen@...
|
|

Chen, Zide
Hi Dubravko,
With my acrn.efi, it switches to guest console by default. Does it switch back to ACRN console by pressing "Ctrl + Space"?
The logs show that X2APIC is not enabled by Linux. Is it possible to enable X2APIC from BIOS?
Without X2APIC, ACRN doesn't work. Though I'm expecting ACRN should go beyond what it is now.
BTW, can you remove "quiet" from the Linux bootargs? This may not really help, but I'm puzzled why it doesn't print any Linux logs.
From the logs, one big difference with my images (acrn.efi + bzImage) is that now it doesn't repeat the SIPI sequence (INIT -> Start up -> INIT -> Start up) endless, instead, after launching 3 VCPUs, the guest sends broadcasting SIPI INIT and Start Up only. This is a good news, but not sure that's because of the new acrn.efi, or the bzImage?
Best Regards, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/12/20 10:36 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote: Hi Zide, I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the mentioned setting or similar or related to it. We are using coreboot, built according to instructions from https://software.intel.com/en-us/firmware/sites/default/files/intelatome3900-0.71-buildinstructions.txt, plus we added support for our board (the link apparently no longer works). In general it works very well. Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference? Best Regards, Zide On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
Hello, Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf. My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall behavior is the same. New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to reference Leaf Hill CRB. After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything). Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be ignored for now. For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and need to debug it. I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached bzImage? Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor. Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues. Best Regards, Zide zide.chen@...
|
|
Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. <dubravko.moravski@...>
Hi Zide,
I've checked all the menus and settings in our BIOS, unfortunately I couldn't find anything that looks like the mentioned setting or similar or related to it.
Best regards,
Dubravko
Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the
environment before printing this email. Privacy
From: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:47 PM
To: acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
Subject: Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
Hi Dubravko,
In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference?
Best Regards,
Zide
On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf.
>
> My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and
> I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall
> behavior is the same.
>
> New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to
> reference Leaf Hill CRB.
>
> After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and
> the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything).
>
> Best regards,
> Dubravko
>
>
> *Dubravko Moravski*
> /SW engineering/
> *Exor Embedded S.r.l.*
> p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413>
> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
> w: exorint.com < https://exorint.com/>
>
>
>
>
> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> Privacy < https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via
> Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM
> *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...>
> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work
> Hi Dubravko,
>
> "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be
> ignored for now.
>
> For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and
> need to debug it.
>
> I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached
> bzImage?
>
> Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in
> acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console
> is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you
> may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor.
>
> Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zide
>
> zide.chen@...
>
>
|
|

Chen, Zide
Hi Dubravko,
In the meantime, is there something like "AP Thread Idle Manner" in your BIOS? And changing its setting makes any difference?
Best Regards, Zide
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/12/20 8:02 AM, Dubravko Moravski | Exor Embedded S.r.l. wrote: Hello, Please find attached the log file and my acrn.conf. My old BIOS didn't have any settings related to Mwait, so I've installed newer BIOS which has "Monitor Mwait Enable" and I've ensured it's set to "Disabled". Changing the BIOS seems to have also changed some data in logs, but the overall behavior is the same. New acrn.efi seems to work reasonably well. Our custom board is obviously specific, but in general it is similar to reference Leaf Hill CRB. After the last printout from the log, everything stops working (there is nothing on the screen attached to the board and the keyboard doesn't do anything; also typing in the serial terminal doesn't do anything). Best regards, Dubravko *Dubravko Moravski* /SW engineering/ *Exor Embedded S.r.l.* p: +38 512455659 <tel:+38 512455659> m:+38 5915402413 <tel:+38 5915402413> a: Slavonska avenija, 50, Zagreb, Croatia, 10000 w: exorint.com <https://exorint.com/> Prima di stampare pensa ai costi ambientali. Please consider the environment before printing this email. Privacy <https://www.exorint.com/it/privacy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> on behalf of Chen, Zide via Lists.Projectacrn.Org <zide.chen=intel.com@...> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2020 1:04 AM *To:* acrn-users@... <acrn-users@...> *Subject:* Re: [acrn-users] Getting ACRN to work Hi Dubravko, "Spurious vector" could because of external interrupts not registered in hypervisor. This may not be an issue and can be ignored for now. For the repeating "Starting VCPU 3" issue, it seems some thing related to SIPI delivery. But nothing is obvious to me and need to debug it. I built a Clear Linux kernel with additional logs showing how it's bringing up APs. Could you please try the attached bzImage? Also please enable early printk by adding "ignore_loglevel earlyprintk=serial,ttyS0,115200n8,keep" to the options in acrn.conf; And use the attached acrn.efi (I enabled some additional logs and print out Linux logs even before ACRN console is operational). If acrn.efi doesn't boot, which is highly possibly since it's not built against your custom board, you may need to apply the attached patch to ACRN hypervisor. Hopefully the full logs can give us some clues. Best Regards, Zide zide.chen@...
|
|