On 18/12/2020 17:48, Geoffroy Van Cutsem wrote:

Hi! I agree with you. It has been a challenge to decide what and to what
level of granularity we describe what we validate, support and "Should
Work". Let me take that comment back to the engineering team, I'm not
too sure how to address it properly but I agree it's less than ideal at
the moment.

The second part of your comment is really the out of the box experience,
and there too it's not very straight-forward to install ACRN even on a
board that's known to work. We have some ideas on how to make that
easier, and with ACRN features maturing, this is climbing up the
priority ladder... so hopefully we'll have something better there in the
near future. If you have ideas yourself on how to make that easier,
please feel free to share them here... and if you have code/scripts to
help us, we'd also certainly welcome contributions in that area ;-)

Are you still having issues with your ACRN set-up by the way? If so,
please tell us more about these and we'll try to help you!

We've not made a start as yet and it will now likely be the new year
before we do. In addition to the Core i7 NUC, we'll also be evaluating
the UP2 Atom E3950, for use in a reduced performance configuration.

Thank you for the offer of help, it's much appreciated. I'll be in touch
should we run into any issues.

Best,

Andrew

--
Andrew Back
http://abopen.com