Aaa, If this is the case, we have to drop this patch.

Good question. If offline tool can calculate automatically, we should persuade this, and avoid user configuration. If not, Offline tool need to provide a user friendly interface to configure. Some thi

In this case, we can automatically calculate the #, right? Hard code the # is not necessary.

When we remove the SSRAM area from SOSVM memory mapping, it is under the context of SSRAM used by pre-launched VMs. If it is not used, or it is not fully used, the SSRAM or the rest SSRAM should be in

Why not use DM emulated vUART for normal VM? Only per-launched VM and RT VM requires HV emulated vUART.

SOS VM may need more vUARTs, but other VMs doesn't. Do we want to stay with a fixed number?

This is a kind of usage scenario dependent configurations. Couple things to revisit: 1: Should we move it to offline tool? Given that the inter-connection of the vUART is already in offline tool. 2: T

Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@...> Please get reviewed by Fei too.

Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@...> Please get review from Fei too.

Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@...>

This patch doesn't have a cover letter. I am unable to know the overall goal of the work. Please make it clear. BTW, I am not sure if we need this kind of full emulation. We already of a simplified vr